AdCheckMe
Editorial Policy
Effective March 31, 2026
This page explains how AdCheckMe selects topics, verifies information, updates articles, and handles corrections. Our goal is to produce original, useful material for publishers and readers who need clear, practical information about digital advertising systems.
1. Editorial scope
We publish content in four categories:
- Monthly ecosystem wrap-ups in AdCheck Latest Pulse.
- Long-form implementation guides in Insights.
- Foundational educational explainers in Learn and History.
- Annual synthesis reports that aggregate and classify the year's major changes.
We do not publish clickbait lists, auto-generated summaries without review, or content whose primary purpose is ad inventory expansion.
2. Source standards
We prioritize primary sources such as official product blogs, API change notices, standards-body announcements, and first-party documentation. Secondary sources may be used for context, but key claims must be attributable to primary sources where possible.
For each publication, we aim to include:
- Specific dates for events and deadlines.
- Direct source links for major claims.
- A clear distinction between fact, inference, and opinion.
3. Originality requirements
Every long-form article must provide one or more original elements, for example:
- A decision framework, taxonomy, or implementation model.
- Cross-source synthesis tailored to publisher operations.
- Risk matrices, rollout checklists, or workflow templates.
We avoid publishing lightly rewritten vendor announcements without added analysis and practical interpretation.
4. Review and update process
Articles include publication date, last-updated date, and reviewer attribution. We revisit time- sensitive pieces whenever platform announcements introduce meaningful changes to guidance.
Update priorities are determined by potential reader impact:
- Deadline-sensitive API and policy changes.
- Measurement or attribution changes that affect interpretation.
- Major standards or ecosystem governance developments.
5. Corrections policy
If we find a factual error, we correct it promptly and update the article's timestamp. For substantial corrections, we add a visible correction note explaining what changed and why.
Readers can report potential issues by emailing adcheck.me.team@gmail.com.
6. Monetization and conflicts
AdCheckMe may earn ad revenue from providers such as Google AdSense. Monetization does not determine editorial conclusions. We do not sell favorable coverage. Content decisions are based on reader value and operational relevance.
7. AI usage disclosure
We may use AI tools for drafting support and research assistance, but human review is required before publication. We do not publish unreviewed machine-generated output as final copy.
Back to home.